Benefit of negative pressure drain within surgical wound after cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer

6Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of subcutaneous negative-pressure wound drains on wound healing after cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer. Methods: A retrospective study was performed on patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer, between 2012 and 2013. The patients were divided into 2 groups, according to using (n = 163) and not using (n = 37) of subcutaneous wound drains, and wound outcomes were analyzed. Results: Patients' characteristics were not statistically different, except for the prolonged operative time in patients with wound drains (median, 395 vs 240 minutes; P = 0.001). A lower rate of wound infection (12.9% vs 27.0%; P = 0.032) was observed in the drain group. In the multivariate analysis, placement of subcutaneous wound drain was an independent prognostic factor for reducing wound complications: Disruption (odds ratio [OR], 0.367; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.145Y0.929; P = 0.034) and wound infection (OR, 0.198; 95% CI, 0.068Y0.582; P = 0.003). Bowel surgery at the time of cytoreductive surgery and prolonged operative time (≥360 minutes) were also associated with higher rates of disruption (OR, 2.845; 95% CI, 1.111Y7.289; P = 0.029) and wound infection (OR, 4.212; 95% CI, 1.273Y13.935; P = 0.019), respectively. Conclusions: Installation of subcutaneous negative-pressure wound drain is an effective method to achieve clearer wound healing and less wound complications after cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, S. I., Lim, M. C., Bae, H. S., Shin, S. R., Seo, S. S., Kang, S., & Park, S. Y. (2015). Benefit of negative pressure drain within surgical wound after cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 25(1), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000315

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free