A comparison of two least-squared random coefficient autoregressive models: with and without autocorrelated errors

  • Araveeporn A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper compares a Least-Squared Random Coefficient Autoregressive (RCA) model with a Least-Squared RCA model based on Autocorrelated Errors (RCA-AR). We looked at only the first order models, denoted RCA(1) and RCA(1)-AR(1). The efficiency of the Least-Squared method was checked by applying the models to Brownian motion and Wiener process, and the efficiency followed closely the asymptotic properties of a normal distribution. In a simulation study, we compared the performance of RCA(1) and RCA(1)-AR(1) by using the Mean Square Errors (MSE) as a criterion. The RCA(1) exhibited good power estimation in both cases where the data is stationary and nonstationary. On the other hand, when data oscillates around its mean, RCA(1)-AR(1) performed better. For real world data, we applied the two models to the daily volume of the Thai gold price and found that RCA(1)-AR(1) performed better than RCA(1).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Araveeporn, A. (2013). A comparison of two least-squared random coefficient autoregressive models: with and without autocorrelated errors. International Journal of Advanced Statistics and Probability, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.14419/ijasp.v1i3.1286

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free