Candida precipitins in pregnant women: validity of the test systems used

8Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Sera from 200 pregnant women, with symptoms suggestive of vaginitis and harbouring yeast in the vagina, were examined for precipitating antibodies to 3 antigens of C. albicans, using a gel double diffusion test. A high overall incidence of precipitin positive sera (47.5%) was found compared with an incidence of 18% in the unselected pregnant population previously studied. Using the clinicopathological criteria of Caroll, Hurley, and Stanley (1973), a final aetiological diagnosis of C. albicans mycosis was reached in 75 cases and precipitins were demonstrated in 64%. Forty eight women harbouring C. albicans responded favourably to a single course of antifungal treatment, and probably had mycotic vaginitis. The incidence of precipitins in this group was 42%. C. albicans was isolated from a further 55 of 62 patients, in whom the incidence of precipitins was 32%. 'Booking' sera were investigated from 50 of the 200 women studied. Sixty four per cent of women had symptoms of vaginitis at booking and 32% were precipitin positive. Twenty eight per cent had precipitins on both occasions, and a further 24% acquired candida precipitins during pregnancy. None of the 7 newborn with oral or skin thrush had precipitins to C. albicans. The results indicate that the detection of precipitating antibodies to C. albicans, particularly to all 3 of the antigens described, would be a useful additional criterion in the diagnosis of Candida vaginitis, particularly if the vaginitis were persistent, recurrent, or unresponsive to therapy. The sensitivity of the test system used was 64%, and its specificity 87%; as such, the test is valid and may be reasonably useful as a screening procedure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stanley, V. C., & Hurley, R. (1974). Candida precipitins in pregnant women: validity of the test systems used. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 27(1), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.27.1.66

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free