Autism Screening in High-Likelihood Children in a Community Early Intervention Setting: A Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Study

0Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Identification of likelihood for autism in the U.S. early intervention (EI) system facilitates referrals to diagnostic assessments and targets autism-specific needs. However, performance of autism screeners in high-likelihood preschool children and barriers to implementation need to be further studied. The current effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 1 study examined the impact of administering the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F) in a sample of preschool children during the EI intake phone call. Data from 2,661 educational records showed that 42.8% of them received the M-CHAT-R. Only 14.0% of the screen-positive children completing the process to determine eligibility for EI services were referred for an autism-specific evaluation. Most of these (94.8%), regardless of screener status, received an autism diagnosis, suggesting that referrals are based on clinical judgment. Training and incorporation to current protocols within agencies are necessary to introduce a screening tool and support implementation fidelity and effective autism detection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Perez Liz, G., Thao, D., Reeb, K., Goy, I., McCurdy, E., Yudell, M., & Robins, D. L. (2025). Autism Screening in High-Likelihood Children in a Community Early Intervention Setting: A Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Study. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 40(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576241308544

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free