Metacognition and english reading-related outcomes for d/deaf and hard of hearing students: A narrative review

6Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this narrative review was to summarize empirical studies regarding the effects of metacognition on English reading-related outcomes for students who are d/Deaf and hard of hearing (d/Dhh). This review covered the timeframe from the publication of the previous and only narrative review conducted by Strassman (1997) to 2020. Several of Strassman’s assertions were confirmed, including the oft-repeated one: d/Dhh students possess inadequate comprehension-monitoring skills. In fact, the students are not aware of effective metacognitive strategies and, in general, do not know “what they do not know.” Although intervention is strongly recommended, a few later studies asserted that such intervention not only should be based on the recommendations of the National Reading Panel, but also should be differentiated to meet the individual needs of d/Dhh students. It was argued that d/Dhh reading comprehension challenges are due to metacognitive or executive function issues; however, this assumption needs to be contextualized within a framework of reading which entails decoding and comprehension processes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yan, P., & Paul, P. V. (2021). Metacognition and english reading-related outcomes for d/deaf and hard of hearing students: A narrative review. Human Research in Rehabilitation, 11(2), 94–112. https://doi.org/10.21554/hrr.092106

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free