Reliability and validity of national end of rotation examinations: An update

7Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose This study sought to evaluate the reliability of the PAEA End of Rotation exam scores used as a combined scale. The study also investigated how closely the individual exam scores and the combined scale correlate with Physician Assistant National Certifying Exam (PANCE) performance to validate their use as tools for assessing physician assistant (PA) students during their clinical training. Methods Deidentified PAEA End of Rotation examination and PANCE scores were used to calculate Pearson correlations, Cronbach's alpha, and value of Cronbach's alpha if individual exams were removed from the analysis. A linear regression model was generated to predict certification exam scores. Results End of Rotation examinations are a reliable predictor of certification examination performance independent of PA program or test version, with Cronbach's alpha at 0.847. Conclusions The mean of all 7 examinations may be used, but the mean of just 4 examinations (Emergency Medicine, Family Medicine, General Surgery, and Internal Medicine) is also a valid predictor of certification examination performance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gietzen, L., Roman, C., & Hegmann, T. (2018). Reliability and validity of national end of rotation examinations: An update. Journal of Physician Assistant Education, 29(2), 86–88. https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000191

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free