Gender Parity in High Impact Cardiology Journals

8Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Despite increased female representation in medical training, women physicians continue to be under-represented in academic cardiology, particularly in senior roles of authorship and leadership. We analyzed the top 20 most-cited cardiology journals (31,540 total articles) between January 1, 2018 and October 31, 2021 for gender distribution of editorial staff and authorship. Our data demonstrated that only 27% of articles had women as first authors and 20% as senior authors. Women constituted 23% of editorial staff. There is a statistically significant negative correlation (R = 0.67, P = 0.0011) between the percentage of women as first authors and the percentage of men on editorial boards. Overall, female authorship increased from 26% first and 19% senior authors in 2018, to 29% first and 22% senior authors in 2021. Women authors are significantly under-represented in academic cardiology publications, and additional work is needed to identify and address barriers to publishing and academic advancement for women in cardiology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Petrechko, O., Faturos, A. S., Pal, S., Khan, U., Majeed, H., Sagheer, S., … Sheikh, A. B. (2023, March 1). Gender Parity in High Impact Cardiology Journals. Current Problems in Cardiology. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101549

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free