Anti-HER2 therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: regimens and treatment outcomes

  • Watanabe K
  • Hagio K
  • Baba M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: To date, trastuzumab (Tr) has been the main treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, with combination therapy with a taxane being the standard treatment. In patients with disease progression, combination with chemotherapeutic agents continued beyond PD is recommended; however, the relative merits of use with lapatinib (TKB) remain to be clarified. The approval of pertuzumab (Per) and T-DM1 has, however, made the choice of treatment more complicated. Aim: To analyze the current clinical conditions with regard to anti-HER2 therapy and examine future treatment guidelines. Methods: We analyzed the regimen treatment line, clinical benefit rate and time to treatment failure (TTF) for treatment with chemotherapy (CT) using Tr, TKB, Per or T-DM1 or with endocrine therapy (ET). Subjects: Subjects included 75 patients who underwent anti-HER2 therapy at our institution . Patient age ranged from 34 to 86 years (median 58), with follow-up ranging from 0 to 115 months (median 29). Results: The number of patients receiving each regimen ranged from 1 to 10 (median 4), with 16 combinations of Tr ± CT/ET, TKB ± CT/ET, Per + Tr + CT, T-DM1 and FEC giving a total of 218 regimens. First-line treatment consisted of Tr + taxane for 34 (45.3%), Tr alone for 16 (21.3%) and Per + Tr + taxane for 13 (22.2%) patients. The most common second-line treatment was Tr + Vinorelbine (VNR) for 15 (33.3%) and TKB + Capecitabine (CAPE) for 10 (22.2%) patients. The clinical benefit rate by line was 74.7%, 51.1%, 37.5% and 27.3% for 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th line, respectively, with late-line treatment also beneficial. When examined by treatment regimen, the clinical benefit rates were particularly high for Tr + taxane (76.6%), Per + Tr + taxane (83.3%) and T-DM1 (85.7%). Conclusions: Our results showed that long-term treatment was possible with even late-line treatment being effective. The response rates for Per and T-DM1 were high, and further extension of treatment period can be expected.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Watanabe, K., Hagio, K., Baba, M., Ikarashi, M., Sato, M., Tomioka, N., & Takahashi, M. (2015). Anti-HER2 therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: regimens and treatment outcomes. Annals of Oncology, 26, vii143. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv472.166

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free