Validity and critical driving errors of on-road assessment for older drivers

45Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. We examined the validity of our on-road driving assessment to quantify its outcomes. METHOD. Older drivers (N = 127) completed a driving assessment on a standardized road course. Measurements included demographics, driving errors, and driving test outcomes; a categorical global rating score (pass-fail); and the sum of maneuvers (SMS) score (0-273). RESULTS. There were significant differences in the SMS (F = 29.9, df = 1, p < .001) between drivers who passed the driving test and those who failed. The SMS cutoff value of 230 points was established as the criterion because it yielded the most optimal combination of sensitivity (0.91) and specificity (0.87). The strongest predictors of failure were adjustment to stimuli and lane maintenance errors. CONCLUSION. The SMS differentiated between passing and failing drivers and can be used to inform clinical decision making.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shechtman, O., Awadzi, K. D., Classen, S., Lanford, D. N., & Joo, Y. (2010). Validity and critical driving errors of on-road assessment for older drivers. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(2), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.64.2.242

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free