Abstract
Background The number of for-profit hospitals has increased in the United States, but their role in and outcomes for graduate medical education (GME) are unclear. Objectives To describe for-profit involvement in internal medicine (IM), general surgery (GS), and pediatrics GME by quantifying change in for-profit affiliated residency programs and comparing for-profit and nonprofit affiliated program board certifying examination pass rates. Methods We used Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and Medicare data to quantify for-profit prevalence in IM, GS, and pediatrics GME from 2001 to 2021. We used public pass rate data from the American Board of Surgeons (2017-2019; n=242 programs; 6562 examinees), American Board of Internal Medicine (2018-2020; n=465 programs; 23 922 examinees), and American Board of Pediatrics (2018-2020; n=202 programs; 9819 examinees) to model the relationship between profit status and pass rate within each specialty and across specialties combined using linear regression. Results The proportion of for-profit affiliated residency programs increased 400.0% in IM, 334.4% in GS, and 23.2% in pediatrics from 2001 to 2021. Bivariate linear regression revealed significantly lower pass rate in for-profit affiliated programs in IM (β =-7.73, P
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Lassner, J. W., Ahn, J., Martin, S., McQueen, A., & Kukulski, P. (2022). Quantifying For-Profit Outcomes in GME: A Multispecialty Analysis of Board Certifying Examination Pass Rates in For-Profit Affiliated Residency Programs. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 14(4), 431–438. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-21-01097.1
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.