Lack of mutagenic and co-mutagenic effects of magnetic fields during magnetic resonance imaging

23Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Mutagenic and co-mutagenic effects of static, pulsed bipolar gradient, and high-frequency magnetic fields, as well as combinations of them, were examined using the Ames test. The Ames test using Salmonella typhimurium bacteria, wild-type strain RTA, preincubation assay, without metabolic activation, was performed. All combinations of magnetic fields were tested with and without co-exposure to N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine and benzo[α]pyrene-4,5-oxide, ethylene oxide, carboplatin, or cisplatin. As expected, chemical mutagens caused a clear-cut increase of the revertants in the Ames test. However, neither the static fields nor a combination of a static magnetic field with the time-varying bipolar gradient field or a pulsed high-frequency magnetic field caused an alteration in the number of revertants in the Ames test. No co-mutagenic effect of any magnetic field combination was observed. In conclusion, magnetic fields used during clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were neither mutagenic nor comutagenic. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schreiber, W. G., Teichmann, E. M., Schiffer, I., Hast, J., Akbari, W., Georgi, H., … Hengstler, J. G. (2001). Lack of mutagenic and co-mutagenic effects of magnetic fields during magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 14(6), 779–788. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.10010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free