The amino-acid composition of potato protein and of cooked potato

  • Hughes B
17Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The potato's nitrogenous constituents have a nutritive value as high as do those of whole wheat (Chick & Cutting, 1943). This has long seemed surprising, for the pro- portion of protein nitrogen in the potato may be as low as 37% and appears not to exceed about 60% (Neuberger & Sanger, 1942; Mulder & Bakema, 1956) of the total nitrogen. The non-protein nitrogen, which consists largely of asparagine and glut- amine together with other nitrogenous bases (Neuberger & Sanger, 1942), is of low nutritive value with no growth-promoting properties on its own (Chick & Cutting, 1943; Chick & Slack, 1949), but nevertheless appears to have a supplementary action when mixed with wheat gluten (Chick & Slack, unpublished, reported by Chick, 1950). The existing amino-acid analyses of the heat-coagulable protein that forms the bulk of the potato protein (Neuberger & Sanger, 1942; Mulder & Bakema, 1956), of the non-protein nitrogen and of the whole raw potato have so far provided only in part an explanation of these facts ; moreover, there are considerable discrepancies between the results of different authors. For these reasons it seemed worth while to repeat and extend some of the analyses by the method of ion-exchange chromatography of Moore & Stein (1951). The iso- lated, crude potato protein has been analysed and also the whole potato after being cooked by boiling, because this is how potatoes are generally prepared for con- sumption. Moreover, losses of nitrogenous material are likely to be greatest with this form of cooking (McCance, Widdowson & Shackleton, 1936) and might cause differences in composition from that of whole raw potato, for which some information does exist (Slack, 1948; Lyman & Kuiken, 1949; Agren, 1949).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hughes, B. P. (1958). The amino-acid composition of potato protein and of cooked potato. British Journal of Nutrition, 12(2), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19580026

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free