The effect of an unplanned excision of a soft-tissue sarcoma on prognosis

151Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We investigated whether our policy of routine re-excision of the tumour bed after an unplanned excision of a soft-tissue sarcoma was justified. Between April 1982 and December 2005, 2201 patients were referred to our hospital with the diagnosis of soft-tissue sarcoma, of whom 402 (18%) had undergone an unplanned excision elsewhere. A total of 363 (16.5%) were included in this study. Each patient was routinely restaged and the original histology was reviewed. Re-excision was undertaken in 316 (87%). We analysed the patient, tumour and treatment factors in relation to local control, metastasis and overall survival. Residual tumour was found in 188 patients (59%). There was thus no residual disease in 128 patients of whom 10% (13) went on to develop a local recurrence. In 149 patients (47%), the re-excision specimen contained residual tumour, but it had been widely excised. Local recurrence occurred in 30 of these patients (20%). In 39 patients (12%), residual tumour was present in a marginal resection specimen. Of these, 46% (18) developed a local recurrence. A final positive margin in a high-grade tumour had a 60% risk of local recurrence even with post-operative radiotherapy. Metastases developed in 24% (86). The overall survival was 77% at five years. Survival was related to the grade of the tumour and the finding of residual tumour at the time of reexcision. We concluded that our policy of routine re-excision after unplanned excision of soft-tissue sarcoma was justified in view of the high risk of finding residual tumour. ©2008 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chandrasekar, C. R., Wafa, H., Grimer, R. J., Carter, S. R., Tillman, R. M., & Abudu, A. (2008). The effect of an unplanned excision of a soft-tissue sarcoma on prognosis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B, 90(2), 203–208. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B2.19760

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free