Effectiveness of aural-oral approach based on volubility of a deaf child with late-mapping bilateral cochlear implants

1Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of aural-oral habilitation (AO) over the traditional speech-language therapy, based on the number of vocalization-volubility of a deaf child with late-mapping bilateral cochlear implants using sequential measure-ments. Methods: The spontaneous productions during child interactions were analyzed. The child (CY, 7;0 years old) with a mean unaided pure-tone average (PTA) hearing loss >80 dB HL was assessed by using an assessment battery. Study design consisted of two phases: (a) baseline (end of speech therapy) and (b) end of AO treatment. Protophones were analyzed via acoustical analysis using PRAAT software. Results: One-way repeated-measure ANOVAs were conducted within and between phases. The analyses revealed significant differences between the ‘phase’ and the vocalization outcome (F = 9.4, df = 1, p = 0.035). Post hoc analyses revealed the significant difference between the mean number of disyllable vocalizations of AO approach (p = 0.05). The mean number of vocalizations was calculated for each protophone type, but no other significant difference was measured. Conclusions: AO approach proved effective as measured through volubility. The outcome of this study is indicative and is a starting point for broader research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Binos, P., Theodorou, E., Elriz, T., & Konstantopoulos, K. (2021). Effectiveness of aural-oral approach based on volubility of a deaf child with late-mapping bilateral cochlear implants. Audiology Research, 11(3), 373–383. https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres11030035

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free