ICU fire evacuation preparedness in London: A cross-sectional study

28Citations
Citations of this article
107Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Hospital fires present a sporadic but significant threat to patients and staff. This is especially so within an intensive care unit (ICU) setting, due to the complexity of moving acutely unwell patients reliant on invasive monitoring and organ support. Despite an average of 500 in-hospital fires reported to the UK department of health per annum, causing 65 injuries and 12 fatalities, the readiness of ICUs for urgent evacuation has not been assessed. Methods. A cross-sectional survey of all 50 adult and paediatric ICUs within the London Postgraduate Deanery was conducted; neonatal units were excluded. The senior nurse at each unit was asked to complete a 90-question structured questionnaire, covering unit patient characteristics, design, equipment, training, and their evacuation plan. Thirty-five of 50 (70) responded within 2 months of the study. Results. Significant weaknesses were reported in unit design, equipment, and planning. Unit design was compromised by inadequate fire doors (20), ventilation cut-outs (17), and escape routes (up to 60). The ability to evacuate multiple patients simultaneously may be limited by a lack of portable monitoring equipment (49 of beds) and emergency drug supplies (20 of beds). Evacuation plans were often limited in their scope (96 expected to remain on their floor; 14 had plans to obtain medications after evacuation), and not rehearsed (60). Staff training, while well provided for permanent staff, is less so for temporary staff (34). Conclusions. Forward planning for an urgent evacuation can be improved. © 2011 The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Murphy, G. R. F., & Foot, C. (2011). ICU fire evacuation preparedness in London: A cross-sectional study. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 106(5), 695–698. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer033

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free