Wound complications after total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing staples with sutures

Abstract

Objective:Does the use of staples or sutures for wound closure have a lower surgical site infection rate in patients receiving primary total hip arthroplasty (THA)?Design:Prospective, randomised controlled multicentre trial.Methods:535 patients undergoing THA were included and randomised into 2 groups: 268 wounds were closed with staples, and 267 with sutures. Primary outcome was surgical site infection (SSI). Secondary outcomes were prosthetic joint infection (PJI), other wound complications (dehiscence, necrosis and prolonged drainage) and duration of admittance. Follow-up occurred at 2, 6, and 12 weeks, and at 1 year.Results:There were no significant demographic differences between the 2 groups. SSI occurred more frequently when wounds were closed with staples (4% compared to 1% with sutures; OR 2.8; CI, 0.885–0.952; p = 0.057). SSI was treated with oral antibiotics. The staples group showed significantly more wound complications (17% compared to 5%; OR 3.943, CI 2.073–7.498; p = 0.000). Wound discharge was significantly prolonged in the staples group (n = 40, compared to n = 12 in the sutures group; OR 3.728; CI, 1.909–7.281; p = 0.000). There was no significant difference in PJI (p = 0.364).Conclusions:In this large RCT comparing staples with sutures after THA, the use of staples is associated with a nearly 3 times greater risk of SSI (OR 2.8; p = 0.057). Staples significantly prolong wound discharge. The use of sutures for wound closure after THA is advised.Trial registration: Staples Or Sutures trial (S.O.S. trial) http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=3946, NTR3946.