Complexity and demographic explanations of cumulative culture

19Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Formal models have linked prehistoric and historical instances of technological change (e.g., the Upper Paleolithic transition, cultural loss in Holocene Tasmania, scientific progress since the late nineteenth century) to demographic change. According to these models, cumulation of technological complexity is inhibited by decreasing - while favoured by increasing - population levels. Here we show that these findings are contingent on how complexity is defined: demography plays a much more limited role in sustaining cumulative culture in case formal models deploy Herbert Simon's definition of complexity rather than the particular definitions of complexity hitherto assumed. Given that currently available empirical evidence doesn't afford discriminating proper from improper definitions of complexity, our robustness analyses put into question the force of recent demographic explanations of particular episodes of cultural change. © 2014 Querbes et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Querbes, A., Vaesen, K., & Houkes, W. (2014). Complexity and demographic explanations of cumulative culture. PLoS ONE, 9(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102543

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free