Ligand interactions with eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2: Role of the γ-subunit

88Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF-2) comprises three non-identical subunits α, β and γ. In vitro, eIF-2 binds the initiator methionyl-tRNA in a GTP-dependent fashion. Based on similarities between eukaryotic eIF-2γ proteins and eubacterial EF-Tu proteins, we previously proposed a major role for the γ-subunit in binding guanine nucleotide and tRNA. We have tested this hypothesis by examining the biochemical activities of yeast eIF-2 purified from wild-type strains and strains harboring mutations in the eIF-2γ structural gene (GCD11) predicted to alter ligand binding by eIF-2. The alteration of tyrosine 142 in yeast eIF-2γ, corresponding to histidine 66 in Escherichia coil EF-Tu, dramatically reduced the affinity of eIF-2 for Met-tRNA(i)(Met) without affecting the k(off) value for guanine nucleotides. In contrast, non-lethal substitutions at a conserved lysine residue (K250) in the putative guanine ring-binding loop increased the off-rate for GDP, thereby mimicking the function of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor eIF-2B, without altering the apparent dissociation constant for Met-tRNA(i)(Met). For eIF-2[γ-K250R], the increased off-rate also seen for GTP was masked by the presence of Met-tRNA(i)(Met) in vitro. In vivo, increasing the dose of the yeast initiator tRNA gene suppressed the slow-growth phenotype and reduced GCN4 expression in gcd11-K250R and gcd11-Y142H strains. These studies indicate that the γ-subunit of eIF-2 does indeed provide EF-Tu-like function to the eIF-2 complex, and further suggest that the level of Met-tRNA(i)(Met) is critical for maintaining wild-type rates of initiation in vivo.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Erickson, F. L., & Hannig, E. M. (1996). Ligand interactions with eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2: Role of the γ-subunit. EMBO Journal, 15(22), 6311–6320. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb01021.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free