Abstract
Background . Stroke commonly affects upper extremity motor abilities, yet there has been very limited success in developing effective rehabilitation interventions to remediate motor impairments, particularly for the upper extremity. Objective . To determine if task-oriented practice administered soon after stroke is more effective than usual care in improving poststroke upper extremity motor recovery and to explore the optimal amount of practice. Methods . A systematic review of the literature was performed from 1950 to November 2012, to identify randomized controlled trials of task-oriented practice compared to usual care, or to different amounts of task-oriented practice to improve motor impairment and activity. Studies were excluded if specific types of interventions were used as comparators or if they were of poor methodological quality. Results . Six studies met the review criteria. Three of the six studies demonstrated a statistically significant effect of task-oriented practice. Study results could not be pooled because of a lack of homogeneity in populations and intervention. Conclusions . The results demonstrate that an increase in the amount of task-oriented practice after stroke may result in less upper extremity impairment; further research on both effect and required dosage is needed as results are inconsistent.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Bosch, J., O’Donnell, M. J., Barreca, S., Thabane, L., & Wishart, L. (2014). Does Task-Oriented Practice Improve Upper Extremity Motor Recovery after Stroke? A Systematic Review. ISRN Stroke, 2014, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/504910
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.