Antibody response, neutralizing potency, and transplacental antibody transfer following SARS-CoV-2 infection versus mRNA-1273, BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy

10Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To improve our understanding of the immune response, including the neutralization antibody response, following COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study comprising patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and patients who received both doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (mRNA-1273, BNT162b2) in pregnancy recruited from two hospitals in Atlanta, GA, USA. Maternal blood and cord blood at delivery were assayed for anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG, IgA and IgM, and neutralizing antibody. The detection of antibodies, titers, and maternal to fetal transfer ratios were compared. Results: Nearly all patients had detectable RBD-binding IgG in maternal and cord samples. The vaccinated versus infected cohort had a significantly greater proportion of cord samples with detectable neutralizing antibody (94% vs. 28%, P < 0.001) and significantly higher transfer ratios for RBD-specific IgG and neutralizing antibodies with a transfer efficiency of 105% (vs. 80%, P < 0.001) and 110% (vs. 90%, P < 0.001), respectively. There was a significant linear decline in maternal and cord blood RBD-specific IgG and neutralizing antibody titers as time from vaccination to delivery increased. Conclusions: Those who receive the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine mount an immune response that is equivalent to—if not greater than—those naturally infected by SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dude, C. M., Joseph, N. T., Forrest, A. D., Verkerke, H. P., Cheedarla, N., Govindaraj, S., … Velu, V. (2023). Antibody response, neutralizing potency, and transplacental antibody transfer following SARS-CoV-2 infection versus mRNA-1273, BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 162(1), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14648

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free