Reliability of using nondestructive tests to estimate compressive strength of building stones and bricks

66Citations
Citations of this article
115Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the relationships between Schmidt hardness rebound number (RN) and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) versus compressive strength (fc) of stones and bricks. Four types of rocks (marble, pink lime stone, white lime stone and basalt) and two types of burned bricks and lime-sand bricks were studied. Linear and non-linear models were proposed. High correlations were found between RN and UPV versus compressive strength. Validation of proposed models was assessed using other specimens for each material. Linear models for each material showed good correlations than non-linear models. General model between RN and compressive strength of tested stones and bricks showed a high correlation with regression coefficient R 2 value of 0.94. Estimation of compressive strength for the studied stones and bricks using their rebound number and ultrasonic pulse velocity in a combined method was generally more reliable than using rebound number or ultrasonic pulse velocity only. © 2012 Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aliabdo, A. A. E., & Elmoaty, A. E. M. A. (2012). Reliability of using nondestructive tests to estimate compressive strength of building stones and bricks. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 51(3), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2012.05.004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free