The Inoculation Fallacy: Why Early Enrichment Cannot Compensate for Poor Adult Environments

  • Parker M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Early-life environmental enrichment (EE) is widely promoted as a route to building resilience and competence, yet these benefits rarely persist when adult environments lack opportunities for agency. Resilience and competence are behavioral properties of current reinforcement contingencies, not internal traits. Across species, early EE fails to compensate for adult environments that withdraw stimulus support or eliminate response–outcome contingencies, producing generalization decrement, extinction-driven behavioral collapse, and negative contrast. Early EE may enhance functional capacity, but positive animal welfare requires sustained agency in adulthood. Welfare strategies should therefore prioritize adult environments that provide reliable choice and instrumental control, with early EE playing a supportive rather than protective role.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Parker, M. O. (2026). The Inoculation Fallacy: Why Early Enrichment Cannot Compensate for Poor Adult Environments. Behavior Analysis in Practice. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-026-01158-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free