Reply to Dong and Zhao: Plant stress via Raman spectroscopy

  • Altangerel N
  • Ariunbold G
  • Gorman C
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Dong and Zhao (1) attempt to provide perspective on our use of Raman spectroscopy in plant stress studies (2). Unfortunately, their experimental criticism is incorrect and their technical suggestions won't work. The following points support these strong statements. Dong and Zhao claim that Raman spectroscopy is limited by its “poor repeatability” (1). Our experimental data speak for themselves, as shown in Fig. 1. The spectra are remarkably consistent between experiments and across species, even though the red-leaved Begonias (Fig. 1) had higher levels of anthocyanins initially. Fig. 1. Texas A&M University data are shown reproducing Raman spectra from …[↵][1]1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: scully{at}tamu.edu. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Altangerel, N., Ariunbold, G. O., Gorman, C., Alkahtani, M. H., Borrego, E. J., Bohlmeyer, D., … Scully, M. O. (2017). Reply to Dong and Zhao: Plant stress via Raman spectroscopy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707722114

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free