Researchers' perspectives on open access scholarly communication in Tanzanian public universities

  • Dulle F
  • Minishi-Majanja M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
100Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This research explored the awareness, usage and perspectives of Tanzanian researchers on open access as a mode of scholarly communication. A survey questionnaire targeted 544 respondents selected through stratified random sampling from a population of 1088 university researchers of the six public universities in Tanzania. With a response rate of 73%, the data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences. The study reveals that the majority of the researchers were aware of and were positive towards open access. Findings further indicate that the majority of researchers in Tanzanian public universities used open access outlets more to access scholarly content than to disseminate their own research findings. It seems that most of these researchers would support open access publishing more if issues of recognition, quality and ownership were resolved. Thus many of them supported the idea of establishing institutional repositories at their respective universities as a way of improving the dissemination of local content. The study recommends that public universities and other research institutions in the country should consider establishing institutional repositories, with appropriate quality assurance measures, to improve the dissemination of research output emanating from these institutions.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dulle, F. W., & Minishi-Majanja, M. K. (2009). Researchers’ perspectives on open access scholarly communication in Tanzanian public universities. SA Journal of Information Management, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v11i4.413

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 28

70%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

18%

Researcher 4

10%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 32

51%

Computer Science 14

22%

Arts and Humanities 12

19%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free