Impact of New Combined Treatment Method on the Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of MICP-Improved Sand

29Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) is a green bio-inspired soil solidification technique that depends on the ability of urease-producing bacteria to form calcium carbonate that bonds soil grains and, consequently, improves soil mechanical properties. Meanwhile, different treatment methods have been adopted to tackle the key challenges in achieving effective MICP treatment. This paper proposes the combined method as a new MICP treatment approach, aiming to develop the efficiency of MICP treatment methods and simulate naturally cemented soil. This method combines the premixing, percolation, and submerging MICP methods. The strength outcomes of Portland-cemented and MICP-cemented sand using the percolation and combined methods were compared. For Portland-cemented sand, the UCS values varied from 0.6 MPa to 17.2 MPa, corresponding to cementation levels ranging from 5% to 30%. For MICP-cemented sand, the percolation method yielded UCS values ranging from 0.5 to 0.9 MPa, while the combined method achieved 3.7 MPa. The strength obtained by the combined method is around 3.7 times higher than that of the percolation method. The stiffness of bio-cemented samples varied between 20 and 470 MPa, while for Portland-cemented sand, it ranged from 130 to 1200 MPa. In terms of calcium carbonate distribution, the percolation method exhibited higher concentration at the top of the sample, while the combined method exhibited more precipitation at the top and perimeter, with less concentration in the central bottom region, equivalent to 10% of a half section’s area.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zeitouny, J., Lieske, W., Alimardani Lavasan, A., Heinz, E., Wichern, M., & Wichtmann, T. (2023). Impact of New Combined Treatment Method on the Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of MICP-Improved Sand. Geotechnics, 3(3), 661–685. https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics3030036

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free