Strengths and weakness of neuroscientific investigations of childhood poverty: Future directions

20Citations
Citations of this article
114Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The neuroscientific study of child poverty is a topic that has only recently emerged. In comparison with previous reviews (e.g., Hackman and Farah, 2009; Lipina and Colombo, 2009; Hackman et al., 2010; Raizada and Kishiyama, 2010; Lipina and Posner, 2012), our perspective synthesizes findings, and summarizes both conceptual and methodological contributions, as well as challenges that face current neuroscientific approaches to the study of childhood poverty. The aim of this effort is to identify target areas of study that could potentially help build a basic and applied research agenda for the coming years.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lipina, S. J., & Soledad Segretin, M. (2015). Strengths and weakness of neuroscientific investigations of childhood poverty: Future directions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(FEB). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00053

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free