Non-Redfieldian carbon model for the Baltic Sea (ERGOM version 1.2)-implementation and budget estimates

28Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Marine biogeochemical models based on Redfield stoichiometry suffer from underestimating carbon fixation by primary production. The most pronounced indication of this is the overestimation of the dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) concentration and, consequently, the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in surface waters. The reduced production of organic carbon will impact most biogeochemical processes. We propose a marine biogeochemical model allowing for a non-Redfieldian carbon fixation. The updated model is able to reproduce observed partial pressure of carbon dioxide and other variables of the ecosystem, like nutrients and oxygen, reasonably well. The additional carbon uptake is realized in the model by an extracellular release (ER) of dissolved organic matter (DOM) from phytoplankton. Dissolved organic matter is subject to flocculation and the sinking particles remove carbon from surface waters. This approach is mechanistically different from existing non-Redfieldian models which allow for flexible elemental ratios for the living cells of the phytoplankton itself. The performance of the model is demonstrated as an example for the Baltic Sea. We have chosen this approach because of a reduced computational effort which is beneficial for large-scale and long-Term model simulations. Budget estimates for carbon illustrate that the Baltic Sea acts as a carbon sink. For alkalinity, the Baltic Sea is a source due to internal alkalinity generation by denitrification. Owing to the underestimated model alkalinity, an unknown alkalinity source or underestimated land-based fluxes still exist.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Neumann, T., Radtke, H., Cahill, B., Schmidt, M., & Rehder, G. (2022). Non-Redfieldian carbon model for the Baltic Sea (ERGOM version 1.2)-implementation and budget estimates. Geoscientific Model Development, 15(22), 8473–8540. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8473-2022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free