Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth with different direct corono-radicular restoration methods

11Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Endodontically treated teeth are widely considered to be more susceptible to fracture than vital teeth. Obturation procedures and post placement have been a main cause of vertical root fracture. Material and Methods: Forty-eight human premolars with standardized weakened roots were endodontically treated and allocated to four experimental groups (n=12). After root canal treatment, in group 1, fiber posts #1 were cemented in root canals using Estelite Core Quick, and the crowns were restored with resin composite. For group 2 and 3, the roots and crowns were restored using a light-cured and self-cured adhesive and resin composites respectively. In group 4, it was used the Panavia F 2.0 resin cement and resin composite for corono-radicular reconstruction. In group 5, the teeth remained untouched. After 24 hours storage and 1000 thermocycles, samples were loaded at a cross head speed of 1 mm per minute. Results: A significant difference was observed in fracture resistance among groups 4 and 5 compared to other groups. Conclusions: Root reconstruction with fiber post and Panavia resin cement, and crown building using light-cured resin composite resulted in increased fracture resistance equal to that of intact teeth.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moosavi, H., Afshari, S., & Manari, F. (2017). Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth with different direct corono-radicular restoration methods. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 9(3), e454–e459. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.53160

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free