Nuclear weapons and medicine: some ethical dilemmas.

7Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The enormous destructive power of present stocks of nuclear weapons poses the greatest threat to public health in human history. Technical changes in weapons design are leading to an increased emphasis on the ability to fight a nuclear war, eroding the concept of deterrence based on mutually assured destruction and increasing the risk of nuclear war. Medical planning and civil defence preparations for nuclear war have recently been increased in several countries although there is little evidence that they will be of significant value in the aftermath of a nuclear conflict. These developments have raised new ethical dilemmas for those in health professions. If there is any risk of use of weapons of mass destruction, then support for deterrence with these weapons as a policy for national or global security appears to be incompatible with basic principles of medical ethics and international law. The primary medical responsibility under such circumstances is to participate in attempts to prevent nuclear war.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haines, A., de B White, C., & Gleisner, J. (1983). Nuclear weapons and medicine: some ethical dilemmas. Journal of Medical Ethics, 9(4), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.9.4.200

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free