Rethinking Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock: A Phase-Adapted, Endothelium-Sparing Approach to Mitigate Capillary Leak

0Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Sepsis-induced endothelial dysfunction and the resultant capillary leak syndrome are defining features of septic shock, posing a profound challenge to conventional fluid resuscitation strategies. The long-standing debate over crystalloid versus colloid administration is evolving beyond a simple dichotomy toward a more nuanced, physiologically informed approach. This review critically examines the pathophysiological cascade driving vascular hyperpermeability in sepsis—from endothelial glycocalyx degradation and inflammatory cytokine storms to oxidative stress and nitric oxide dysregulation. We trace the evolution of resuscitation paradigms from early goal-directed therapy to modern conservative approaches, highlighting the limitations of crystalloid-dominant protocols, including intravascular volume depletion despite a positive fluid balance and iatrogenic organ injury. Drawing on evidence from landmark clinical trials (eg, ALBIOS, CRISTAL, SMART) and a pharmacological reappraisal of fluid properties, we argue that a one-size-fits-all strategy is obsolete. Instead, this narrative review synthesizes recent trial evidence and pathophysiological insights to propose the Phase-Adapted, Endothelium-Sparing (PAES) resuscitation strategy, a novel framework that tailors fluid type and volume to the distinct temporal phases of septic shock: Rescue, Optimization, Stabilization, and De-escalation. This model advocates for initial resuscitation with balanced crystalloids, followed by the judicious integration of albumin in specific, high-risk patient subgroups to leverage its unique oncotic and pleiotropic, endothelium-stabilizing effects. We further outline how dynamic hemodynamic monitoring, point-of-care ultrasound, and emerging biomarkers of endothelial injury (eg, syndecan-1, angiopoietin-2) can guide the real-time implementation of this personalized strategy. The PAES framework aims to uncouple macrohemodynamic stabilization from microcirculatory injury, offering a pragmatic pathway to optimize perfusion, mitigate capillary leak, and improve outcomes in this critically ill population.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, B., & Zhao, L. (2026). Rethinking Fluid Resuscitation in Septic Shock: A Phase-Adapted, Endothelium-Sparing Approach to Mitigate Capillary Leak. Journal of Inflammation Research . Dove Medical Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S587066

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free