Comparison of etomidate and propofol for anaesthesia in microlaryngeal surgery

52Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Propofol and etomidate were compared as hypnotics in total intravenous anaesthesia for microlaryngeal surgery combined with jet ventilation. Two groups of 15 patients were studied. In group 1, propofol 2.0 mg/kg was used for induction. For maintenance a continuons infusion of 12 mg/kg/hour was used for the first 10 minutes, followed by 9 mg/kg/hour for the next 10 minutes and 6 mg/kg/hour thereafter. In group 2, the induction dose of elomidate was 0.3 mg/kg followed by continuons infusion of 1.8 mg/kg/hour for 10 minutes, 1.5 mg/kg/hour for the next 10 minutes and 1.0 mg/kg/hour thereafter. Alfentanil was given for analgesia and suxamethonium for muscle relaxation. The propofol group showed better surgical conditions, more stable anaesthesia and better recovery according to the Steward score. Recovery times to opening eyes on command were comparable for both groups. Copyright © 1987, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

DE GROOD, P. M. R. M., MITSUKURI, S., VAN EGMOND, J., RUTTEN, J. M. J., & CRUL, J. F. (1987). Comparison of etomidate and propofol for anaesthesia in microlaryngeal surgery. Anaesthesia, 42(4), 366–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1987.tb03976.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free