The effects of practice on object-based, location-based, and static-display inhibition of return

63Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We report two experiments that examine the effects of practice on object-based, location-based, and static-display inhibition of return (IOR). The results are clear: All three effects get smaller with practice. These findings are at odds with the results of Müller and von Mühlenen (1996), who failed to observe object-based IOR and detected no effect of practice on static-display IOR. However, their subjects were more practiced than ours prior to data collection. We suggest, therefore, that the reducing effect of practice on IOR might have occurred in their unrecorded practice sessions. We also discuss a two-process model in which IOR is seen as the net effect of underlying inhibitory and excitatory processes. In such models (e.g., Solomon & Corbit, 1974), practice often results in a reduction of the net effect of the two processes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weaver, B., Lupiáñez, J., & Watson, F. L. (1998). The effects of practice on object-based, location-based, and static-display inhibition of return. Perception and Psychophysics, 60(6), 993–1003. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211934

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free