The gender of representation: On democracy, equality, and parity

49Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The debate regarding the statutory introduction of gender parity in electoral lists has been led, on the one hand, by those who envisage parity as a way to attain substantive equality between the genders. The opposition has been led by those who, on the other hand, reject it as going against the very principle of equality in its formal dimension, as well as against the autonomy of political parties. Based on the experience of France and Italy on this matter, this article discusses both sets of arguments and applies them to the Spanish context. It further defends the need to bypass the theoretical parameters of equality and affirmative action in order to place the defense of electoral parity within the theoretical parameters of the postliberal democratic state. It aims, therefore, at articulating electoral parity as a conceptual requisite of the democratic state. © The Author 2008. Oxford University Press and New York University School of Law. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ruiz, B. R., & Rubio-Marín, R. (2008). The gender of representation: On democracy, equality, and parity. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 6(2), 287–316. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mon007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free