Análisis clínico y económico de la histerectomía abdominal versus la histerectomía vaginal en el Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile. Revisión de 2.338 casos

9Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: After cesarean delivery, hysterectomy it is the second most frequently performed major surgical procedure. Objective: To study de relation cost/effectivity between vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy. Method: Retrospective and observational study in 2338 hysterectomy, performed between January 1997 and December 2005. Clinical and cost variables were analysed between both surgical routes. Results: The study included 2338 patients aged 27 to 86 years in whom hysterectomy was performed for benign gynaecologic disorders. Of 2338 hysterectomies, 36.9% were performed vaginally and an abdominal approach was required in 63.1%. The overall complication rate was 29.8 per 100 women for vaginal hysterectomy and 42.8 per 100 women for abdominal hysterectomy. Conclusion: This study suggests that vaginal route presents some advantages in comparison to abdominal hysterectomy that include less expensive, fewer complications, shorter operating times and shorter stays.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Salinas P., H., Pastén M., J., Naranjo D., B., Carmona G., S., Retamales M., B., Díaz V., G., & Franulic C., L. (2006). Análisis clínico y económico de la histerectomía abdominal versus la histerectomía vaginal en el Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile. Revisión de 2.338 casos. Revista Chilena de Obstetricia y Ginecologia, 71(4), 227–233. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-75262006000400002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free