Tools for assessing quality and risk of bias by levels of evidence

15Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Tools for assessing methodological quality or risk of bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRS) were reviewed. The van Tulder scale and Cochrane's assessment of risk of bias are the two most useful methodological quality evaluation tools for RCTs. Cochrane's tool includes sequence generation, allocation of sequence concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting, and other potential sources of bias. The Cochrane Collaboration Group recommends the Downs and Black instrument and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for evaluating the quality of NRS. In conclusion, this study offers useful information to physicians about tools for assessing the quality of evidence in clinical guidelines. Further research is needed to provide an essential core for evidence-based decision making regarding levels and/or grades of recommendations. © Korean Medical Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lim, S. M., Shin, E. S., Lee, S. H., Seo, K. H., Jung, Y. M., & Jang, J. E. (2011). Tools for assessing quality and risk of bias by levels of evidence. Journal of the Korean Medical Association, 54(4), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2011.54.4.419

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free