Histological and Nuclear Medical Comparison of Inflammation after Hemostasis with Non-Thermal Plasma and Thermal Coagulation

24Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine the invasiveness of hemostasis by non-thermal plasma (NTP) compared with hemostasis by thermal coagulation (TC). The inflammation recovery process after hemostasis by TC and NTP was compared by using histological methods and nuclear medical molecular imaging. The necrotic areas in the NTP group disappeared after 5 days, whereas they remained 15 days after hemostasis in the TC group. The accumulation of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucopyranose (18F-FDG), which reflects the existence of inflammatory cells, was higher in the TC group than in the NTP group on day 15. Thus, this study indicates that hemostasis by NTP is less inflammatory than TC. This report is the first to evaluate inflammation that occurred after hemostasis with medical devices noninvasively.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ueda, M., Yamagami, D., Watanabe, K., Mori, A., Kimura, H., Sano, K., … Enomoto, S. (2015). Histological and Nuclear Medical Comparison of Inflammation after Hemostasis with Non-Thermal Plasma and Thermal Coagulation. In Plasma Processes and Polymers (Vol. 12, pp. 1338–1342). Wiley-VCH Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppap.201500099

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free