An improved method for the determination of 1,3-butadiene in nonoccupational environments

16Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Despite health concerns regarding exposure to 1,3-butadiene, there is a dearth of validated methods for its determination in nonoccupational environments. A sampling and analytical methodology is validated for determining 1,3-butadiene in such environments. Samples were collected via sorbent tubes containing 1000 mg of Carbopack B and 150 mg of Carbosieve SIII and analyzed by TD (thermal desorption)-GC/MS. This sorbent combination was compared to that of 600 mg of Carboxen 569. When sampling for 2 h at 30 mL min-1, 20°C and relative humidity 60%, Carbopack B/Carbosieve SIII gave 1,3-butadiene recoveries >95%, compared to ca. 60% for Carboxen 569. The combined sampling and analytical precision of Carbopack B/Carbosieve III was 13% at 0.17 μg m-3, with a detection limit <0.16 μg m-3. Optimum sampling conditions were as follows: duration 2 h, flow rate 30 mL min-1, maximum temperature 35°C. The impact on sampling efficiency of ozone concentrations and relative humidity was negligible. Simultaneous sampling with both Carboxen 569 alone and Carbopack B/Carbosieve SIII in a range of nonoccupational environments and sampling conditions revealed 1,3-butadiene concentrations to be 24-58% when the latter sorbent was used, suggesting that measurements made using carbon molecular sieve sorbents such as Carboxen 569 are underestimates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, Y. M., Harrad, S., & Harrison, R. M. (1999). An improved method for the determination of 1,3-butadiene in nonoccupational environments. Environmental Science and Technology, 33(23), 4342–4345. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9902367

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free