Comparability of biosimilar filgrastim with originator filgrastim: Protein characterization, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics

51Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Biosimilars provide safety, purity, and potency similar to those of a reference biologic product. Methods: An array of protein analytical techniques was used to compare the physicochemical properties of proposed biosimilar filgrastim (EP2006), US-approved originator filgrastim, and EU-approved originator filgrastim. Biological characterization involved surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy analyses and in vitro proliferation assays. A randomized, double-blind, two-way crossover, phase I study in healthy volunteers assessed the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety profiles of EP2006 and US-approved originator filgrastim (administered as a single subcutaneous 10 μg/kg injection). Results: EP2006 and originator filgrastim (US and EU approved) were highly similar with respect to primary, secondary, and tertiary protein structures; mass, size, purity, charge, and hydrophobicity. No differences in receptor binding affinity were observed, and all samples demonstrated similar in vitro bioactivity. In the phase I study, no statistically significant differences between EP2006 and US-approved originator filgrastim were noted in pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic parameters, and all confidence intervals were within the equivalence boundaries. The two products had similar safety profiles. Conclusion: These studies provide robust evidence of the structural and functional similarity between the proposed biosimilar filgrastim (EP2006) and the US-approved originator filgrastim.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sörgel, F., Schwebig, A., Holzmann, J., Prasch, S., Singh, P., & Kinzig, M. (2015). Comparability of biosimilar filgrastim with originator filgrastim: Protein characterization, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics. BioDrugs, 29(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-015-0124-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free