An attempt to conceptualize the individual onco-functional balance: Why a standardized treatment is an illusion for diffuse low-grade glioma patients

73Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the era of evidence-based medicine, clinicians aim to establish standards of care from randomized studies. Following, personalized medicine has emerged, as new individualized biomarkers could help to predict sensitivity to specific treatment. In this paper, we show that, for diffuse low-grade glioma, some specificities – dual goal of both survival and functional gain, long duration of the disease with multistep treatments, multiparametric evaluation of the onco-functional balance of each treatment modality – call for a change of paradigm. After summarizing how to weight the benefits and risks of surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, we show that the overall efficacy of a treatment modality cannot be assessed per se, as it depends on its integration in the whole sequence. Then, we revisit the notion of personalized medicine: instead of decision-making based solely on molecular profile, we plead for a recursive algorithm, allowing a dynamic evaluation of the onco-functional balance, integrating many individual characteristics of the patient's tumor and brain function.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mandonnet, E., & Duffau, H. (2018, February 1). An attempt to conceptualize the individual onco-functional balance: Why a standardized treatment is an illusion for diffuse low-grade glioma patients. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. Elsevier Ireland Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.12.008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free