Construction and demolition waste recycling through conventional jig, air jig, and sensor-based sorting: A comparison

21Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The paper presents a comparison of the concentration methods conventional jig, air jig, and sensor-based sorting to treat construction and demolition waste. All tests were made with concrete, brick, and gypsum particles and the tests aim to separate these materials into different size ranges, depending on the method. The equipment tested, conventional jig, air jig, and sensor-based sorting present good results to concentrate construction and demolition waste particles, with different concentrations and mass recoveries. The results show particularly good mass recoveries and particle concentration for conventional jig, especially for concrete and gypsum particles. Sensor-based sorting should preferably use concentration circuits for best results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sampaio, C. H., Ambrós, W. M., Cazacliu, B. G., Moncunill, J. O., Veras, M. M., Miltzarek, G. L., … Liendo, M. A. (2021). Construction and demolition waste recycling through conventional jig, air jig, and sensor-based sorting: A comparison. Minerals, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/min11080904

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free