Mitigating eye strain in the digital era: The efficacy of the 20-20-20 rule

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of the 20-20-20 rule in alleviating symptoms of digital eye strain (DES) among individuals with prolonged screen exposure. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in the Ophthalmology Outpatient Department of a tertiary care hospital in Panipat. A total of 268 participants aged 18–60 years, each reporting more than 4 hours of daily screen use, were enrolled. Participants were instructed to follow the 20-20-20 rule, which involves taking a 20-second break every 20 minutes to focus on an object at least 20 feet away. Data were collected using Google Forms at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. The questionnaire recorded demographic details, screen usage, and asthenopic symptoms. Symptom relief and adherence to the rule were assessed at follow-up visits. Results: The mean age of participants was 45.93 years, with an average daily screen time of 6.34 hours. Mobile phones were the primary devices used by 78% of participants. At the 4-week follow-up, 59% reported symptom relief, with significant improvements in tired eyes (p=0.002), headache (p<0.01), and burning sensation (p<0.01). Looking at a distance was effective for 78% of participants (p<0.001). However, 41% continued to experience persistent symptoms despite adherence, indicating the need for additional interventions. Conclusion: The 20-20-20 rule is a simple and effective strategy for reducing symptoms of digital eye strain. However, outcomes vary depending on adherence and individual factors. Incorporating additional preventive measures and long-term strategies may further enhance eye comfort and visual health in the digital era.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yadav, P., Garg, K., Gupta, K., & Gupta, B. K. (2025). Mitigating eye strain in the digital era: The efficacy of the 20-20-20 rule. Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 11(4), 670–675. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijceo.9374.1761134872

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free