Weighing the Options: Discrimination Against Fat Golfers

  • Melton E
  • Cunningham G
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In drawing from multiple theoretical frameworks, including stigma theory (Goffman, 1963; Paetzold, Dipboye, & Eslbach, 2008) and social dominance theory (Sidanius & Pratto, 1999), the purpose of this study was to examine the possibility of weight discrimination among coaches of NCAA women’s golf teams. Coaches participated in an experimental study, where they reviewed the resumes of high school golfers and indicated the likelihood of offering the golfer an athletic scholarship. The resumes varied by weight of the golfer and skill level, and coaches’ social dominance orientation was also measured. Fat golfers were less likely to be offered a scholarship than were thinner golfers. Player skill level moderated these effects, as did the coaches’ social dominance orientation. Contributions, limitations, and future directions are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Melton, E. N., & Cunningham, G. B. (2016). Weighing the Options: Discrimination Against Fat Golfers. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 9(2), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1123/jis.2016-0017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free