Abstract
This essay provides a critical assessment of species pluralism, a popular strategy to explain the discordance characterizing contemporary systematics. Specifically, my aim is to present and scrutinize species pluralism, and to discuss whether it provides a fruitful concept in biology. The article begins by distinguishing two independent theses often associated with pluralism: 'heterogeneity' and 'theory dependence.' Next, it examines how these theses have been developed in the scientific and philosophical literature. I conclude by suggesting that the overarching expression 'species pluralism' be dropped in favor of more perspicuous labels. Keywords species problem • species pluralism • species eliminativism • heterogeneity • theory-dependence • individuality thesis Part of the special issue Species in the Age of Discordance, guest-edited by Matthew H. Haber and Daniel J. Molter.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Nathan, M. J. (2019). Pluralism is the Answer! What is the Question? Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology, 11(20220112). https://doi.org/10.3998/ptpbio.16039257.0011.015
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.