Governance by Gaslight: The Reproductive Politics of the Two-Child Limit

3Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In 2017, the UK government limited the number of children for a whom a low-income family could claim a means tested benefit (the "child element"of "Universal Credit") to two. Since then, over 400,000 families - including 1.5 million children - have been affected by the "two-child limit."Emerging research indicates that the limit has done little to influence fertility rates, nothing to influence workforce participation, and a great deal to increase financial hardship and poverty. Via a synthesis of existing research, and a critical analysis of formal policy dialogue, I explore the specifically reproductive politics of the two-child limit. I cast the limit as "successful"reproductive governance, a "technology of discipline"with complementary effects and rationales, which works by further marginalizing intersectionally marginalized women. In concluding, I argue that the state justifies this abject outcome via what has been termed "cultural gaslighting."

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hewer, R. (2024). Governance by Gaslight: The Reproductive Politics of the Two-Child Limit. Social Politics, 31(3), 455–479. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxae011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free