Efficacy and Safety of Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab versus Sorafenib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Main Trunk and/or Contralateral Portal Vein Invasion in IMbrave150

51Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) versus sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in IMbrave150. Efficacy and safety in patient subpopulations with Vp4 portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) and other high-risk prognostic factors are reported. Methods: IMbrave150 was a global, randomized (2: 1), open-label, phase 3 study in systemic treatment.naive patients with unresectable HCC; OS and PFS were co-primary endpoints. Exploratory analyses compared the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab 1,200 mg plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks versus sorafenib 400 mg twice daily in patients (i) with and without Vp4 PVTT alone and (ii) with and without high-risk prognostic factors. Results: In patients with Vp4 PVTT, median OS was 7.6 months (95% CI: 6.0.13.9) with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (n = 48) and 5.5 months (95% CI: 3.4.6.7) with sorafenib (n = 25; HR 0.62 [95% CI: 0.34.1.11]; descriptive p = 0.104). Median PFS in the respective arms was 5.4 months (95% CI: 3.6.6.9) and 2.8 months (95% CI: 1.5.5.3; HR 0.62 [95% CI: 0.35.1.09]; descriptive p = 0.094). In patients without Vp4, median OS was 21.1 months (95% CI: 18.0.24.6) with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (n = 288) and 15.4 months (95% CI: 12.6.18.6) with sorafenib (n = 140; HR 0.67 [95% CI: 0.51.0.88]; descriptive p = 0.003). Median PFS in the respective arms was 7.1 months (95% CI: 6.1.9.6) and 4.7 months (95% CI: 4.2.6.1; HR 0.64 [95% CI: 0.51.0.81]; descriptive p < 0.001). The high-risk versus non.high-risk populations had similar outcome patterns. In the respective treatment arms, grade .3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 43% and 48% of patients with Vp4 and 46% and 47% of patients without Vp4. Conclusion: Regardless of VP4 PVTT or other high-risk features of unresectable HCC, which have often resulted in exclusion from other front-line trials, patients benefited from atezolizumab and bevacizumab versus sorafenib.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Finn, R. S., Galle, P. R., Ducreux, M., Cheng, A. L., Reilly, N., Nicholas, A., … Breder, V. (2024). Efficacy and Safety of Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab versus Sorafenib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Main Trunk and/or Contralateral Portal Vein Invasion in IMbrave150. Liver Cancer, 13(6), 655–668. https://doi.org/10.1159/000539897

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free