Packing dimension and Cartesian products

  • Bishop C
  • Peres Y
13Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We show that for any analytic set A A in R d \mathbf {R}^d , its packing dimension dim P ⁡ ( A ) \dim _{\mathrm {P}}(A) can be represented as sup B { dim H ⁡ ( A × B ) − dim H ⁡ ( B ) } , \; \sup _B \{ \dim _{\mathrm {H}} (A \times B) -\dim _{\mathrm {H}}(B) \} \, , \, where the supremum is over all compact sets B B in R d \mathbf {R}^d , and dim H \dim _{\mathrm {H}} denotes Hausdorff dimension. (The lower bound on packing dimension was proved by Tricot in 1982.) Moreover, the supremum above is attained, at least if dim P ⁡ ( A ) > d \dim _{\mathrm {P}} (A) > d . In contrast, we show that the dual quantity inf B { dim P ⁡ ( A × B ) − dim P ⁡ ( B ) } , \; \inf _B \{ \dim _{\mathrm {P}}(A \times B) -\dim _{\mathrm {P}}(B) \} \, , \, is at least the “lower packing dimension” of A A , but can be strictly greater. (The lower packing dimension is greater than or equal to the Hausdorff dimension.)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bishop, C., & Peres, Y. (1996). Packing dimension and Cartesian products. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 348(11), 4433–4445. https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9947-96-01750-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free