Abstract
We show that for any analytic set A A in R d \mathbf {R}^d , its packing dimension dim P ( A ) \dim _{\mathrm {P}}(A) can be represented as sup B { dim H ( A × B ) − dim H ( B ) } , \; \sup _B \{ \dim _{\mathrm {H}} (A \times B) -\dim _{\mathrm {H}}(B) \} \, , \, where the supremum is over all compact sets B B in R d \mathbf {R}^d , and dim H \dim _{\mathrm {H}} denotes Hausdorff dimension. (The lower bound on packing dimension was proved by Tricot in 1982.) Moreover, the supremum above is attained, at least if dim P ( A ) > d \dim _{\mathrm {P}} (A) > d . In contrast, we show that the dual quantity inf B { dim P ( A × B ) − dim P ( B ) } , \; \inf _B \{ \dim _{\mathrm {P}}(A \times B) -\dim _{\mathrm {P}}(B) \} \, , \, is at least the “lower packing dimension” of A A , but can be strictly greater. (The lower packing dimension is greater than or equal to the Hausdorff dimension.)
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Bishop, C., & Peres, Y. (1996). Packing dimension and Cartesian products. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 348(11), 4433–4445. https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9947-96-01750-3
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.