Comparative Effectiveness of Gabapentin and Pregabalin Combination Therapy in Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Single-Masked Randomised Controlled Trial

3Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of gabapentin combined with pregabalin in postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) attenuation, focusing on patient-reported outcomes and inflammatory cytokine reduction. Study Design: Single-blinded randomised controlled trial. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Dermatology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China, from June to December 2022. Methodology: A total of 134 consecutive patients diagnosed with PHN were randomly allocated into two groups: gabapentin alone (GB group, n = 67) or a combination of gabapentin and pregabalin (GBP group, n = 67) administered orally for 8 weeks. The outcome measures, including the visual analogue scale (VAS) score, clinical efficacy rate, and serum inflammatory factors, were analysed using the t-test, paired t-test, or χ2 test. Results: At 8 weeks post-treatment, the VAS score of the GBP group was statistically lower than that of the GB group (t = 22.441, p <0.001). The clinical efficacy rate of the GBP group was statistically higher than that of the GB group (74.6% vs. 56.7%, p = 0.029). The GBP group had significantly lower serum levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) compared to the GB group (p <0.05). No significant differences were observed in adverse effects between the two groups (46.3% vs. 54.8%, χ2 = 0.478, p = 0.489). Conclusion: The combination therapy with gabapentin and low-dose pregabalin could help reduce pain and inflammatory factors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tao, L., Yin, D., & Xie, J. (2025). Comparative Effectiveness of Gabapentin and Pregabalin Combination Therapy in Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Single-Masked Randomised Controlled Trial. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, 35(9), 1122–1127. https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2025.09.1122

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free