Importance Re-sampling MCMC for cross-validation in inverse problems

10Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper presents a methodology for cross-validation in the context of Bayesian modelling of situations we loosely refer to as 'inverse problems'. It is motivated by an example from palaeoclimatology in which scientists reconstruct past climates from fossils in lake sediment. The inverse problem is to build a model with which to make statements about climate, given sediment. One natural aspect of this is to examine model fit via 'inverse' cross-validation. We discuss the advantages of inverse cross-validation in Bayesian model assessment. In high-dimensional MCMC studies the inverse cross-validation exercise can be computationally burdensome. We propose a fast method involving very many low-dimensional MCMC runs, using Importance Re-sampling to reduce the dimensionality. We demonstrate that, in addition, the method is particularly suitable for exploring multimodal distri- butions. We illustrate our proposed methodology with simulation studies and the complex, high-dimensional, motivating palaeoclimate problem. © 2007 International Society for Bayesian Analysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bhattacharya, S., & Haslett, J. (2007). Importance Re-sampling MCMC for cross-validation in inverse problems. Bayesian Analysis, 2(2), 385–408. https://doi.org/10.1214/07-BA217

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free