Analysis of Retracted Manuscripts in Chemistry: Errors vs Misconduct

9Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this Viewpoint we discuss Chemistry manuscripts retracted during the 2001-2021 period (a total of 1292 journal articles retrieved from the Retraction Watch database). We showed that 58.5% of Chemistry manuscripts were retracted due to misconduct; of them, 40.5% of retractions were due to self-plagiarism and 36% due to fraud. Errors and concerns unrelated to misconduct constituted 26% of all retractions. Retracted manuscripts had a median retraction time of 1.7 years and peer-review time of 71 days (but only 43 days for fraudulent manuscripts).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sevryugina, Y., & Jimenez, R. (2023). Analysis of Retracted Manuscripts in Chemistry: Errors vs Misconduct. ACS Omega, 8(35), 31568–31574. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03689

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free