Population structure of microbial communities associated with two deep, anaerobic, alkaline aquifers

111Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Microbial communities of two deep (1,270 and 316 m) alkaline (pH 9.94 and 8.05), anaerobic (E(h), -137 and -27 mV) aquifers were characterized by rRNA-based analyses. Both aquifers, the Grande Ronde (GR) and Priest Rapids (PR) formations, are located within the Columbia River Basalt Group in south- central Washington, and sulfidogenesis and methanogenesis characterize the GR and PR formations, respectively. RNA was extracted from microorganisms collected from groundwater by ultrafiltration through hollow-fiber membranes and hybridized to taxon-specific oligonucleotide probes. Of the three domains, Bacteria dominated both communities, making up 92.0 and 64.4% of the total rRNA from the GR and PR formations, respectively. Eucarya comprised 5.7 and 14.4%, and Archaea comprised 1.8% and 2.5%, respectively. The gram- positive target group was found in both aquifers, 11.7% in GR and 7.6% in PR. Two probes were used to target sulfate and/or metal-reducing bacteria within the delta subclass of Proteobacteria. The Desulfobacter group was present (0.3%) only in the high-sulfate groundwater (GR). However, comparable hybridization to a probe selective for the desulfovibrios and some metal- reducing bacteria was found in both aquifers, 2.5 and 2.9% from the GR and PR formations, respectively. Selective PCR amplification and sequencing of the desulfovibrio/metal-reducing group revealed a predominance of desulfovibrios in both systems (17 of 20 clones), suggesting that their environmental distribution is not restricted by sulfate availability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fry, N. K., Fredrickson, J. K., Fishbain, S., Wagner, M., & Stahl, D. A. (1997). Population structure of microbial communities associated with two deep, anaerobic, alkaline aquifers. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63(4), 1498–1504. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.63.4.1498-1504.1997

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free